If the debt limit isn`t increased (yah, right) only 5% of the farm bill is in jeopardy. +85% is food stamps. all the tree huggin` stuff already had the money printed from the $1 Trillion Inflation Enhancement Act. I`ve heard though, if we don`t get a farm bill, then we go back to depression era farm policy of parity prices. That would mean Sue Martin would determine our farm prices, parity is literally $13 corn and $30 beans 😀 (parity isn`t as far away as it used to be) hate to say it, but land would be $80,000/acre and $2,000 rent .... well maybe we could try it, see how it works 😀
https://southernagtoday.org/2023/01/what-if-we-dont-get-a-farm-bill-in-2023/
snip:
One of the questions we have been getting the most as agricultural policy economists is whether we are going to get a 2023 Farm Bill on time. While there are dedicated teams of ag committee members and staff in the House of Representatives and Senate who are going to do their best to get a farm bill done on time, history is not on their side. This article isn’t going to focus on the probability or odds of getting a bill in 2023 but rather – how much would it matter if it doesn’t get done?
Figure 1 contains our estimate of the mandatory spending associated with programs that will expire on September 30, 2023. It may come as a surprise to many of our readers that only about 5% of the funding is actually facing the threat of expiration. Why? The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is what’s known as an appropriated entitlement. In other words, if the farm bill expires, the appropriators will continue to fund SNAP. Beyond that, crop insurance is permanently authorized by legislation outside of the farm bill. In addition, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) recently reauthorized spending for the major conservation programs. Further, annual appropriations bills have provided significant funding for ad hoc disaster programs over the past four years for programs such as WHIP, WHIP+, and ERP.
So – what does this information mean? It means that the impending expiration of the 2018 Farm Bill means very little for the vast majority (i.e., 95%) of the mandatory spending in the farm bill. It also means that unless policymakers are able to significantly enhance Title I commodity programs, this is little reason to go through the process that invariably will include damaging amendments to farm policy. While this still leaves a number of programs in limbo (particularly those without mandatory baseline spending), a simple extension of the 2018 Farm Bill would maintain the status quo.
